|
Post by jackiejunkies on Jun 20, 2018 0:24:11 GMT
Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Lets just say hypothetically that the Church of Satan , The American Nazi Party and the KKK all wanted Mike's Daughter Jackie Evancho to perform for them for upcoming Fundraising Events.
Being the open minded individual he claims to be he should have no problem escorting Jackie
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Jun 20, 2018 22:41:21 GMT
Would Mike Evancho refer to this Female Small Business owner as a " Small-Minded , Bigoted A**Hole? "
|
|
|
juxtaposer
|
Posts: | 3 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Likes: | 4 |
Points: |
|
|
|
Post by juxtaposer on Jun 21, 2018 6:06:21 GMT
Would Mike Evancho refer to this Female Small Business owner as a " Small-Minded , Bigoted A**Hole? "
Nothing is black and white, is it. Strange distinction between serving him as a customer and creating floral art for him. One is just doing business and the other a violation of her faith?
|
|
|
hiturbine
|
Posts: | 72 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Likes: | 44 |
Points: |
|
|
|
Post by hiturbine on Jun 21, 2018 6:11:10 GMT
Would Mike Evancho refer to this Female Small Business owner as a " Small-Minded , Bigoted A**Hole? " First - a disclaimer ... I am not not, have never been, and will never be "politically correct" - because objective truth and reason take primacy over "feelings." Sentimentality has no place in so grave a topic. Yes, Mike E. most likely would demean and abuse this woman - because it is he who has a "small mind" - and his is a cowardly mind at that. Why do I make such a judgment? Because it is patently obvious that Mike's wife, Lisa, wears the pants. She seems the one pushing the "gay" agenda in the Evancho household - although I think her son Jacob's future will be anything but "gay." Keep in mind that the Evancho's are Catholic, which makes this situation all the more tragic. Obviously they are of a very liberal disposition, since no honest Catholic, faithful to the traditional teachings of the Church, would dare consider the course they chose for their son, Jacob. Mr. E allowed his first born son, confused and desperate, to be irreversibly mutilated, and then flooded with female hormones - which he must continue to use for the rest of his life, but which will eventually kill him since those alien substances will rage against his body's intended and designed natural state. Further, because Jackie is now apparently the family's sole source of income, and herself caught up in this insidious lie that is "transgenderism" - the rational truth of DNA notwithstanding - I will guess that Mike does not want to upset his "golden goose." I could be very wrong in my appraisal, but I'm willing to wager I am not far off the mark. The theory of transgenderism is demonic in origin, yet it is being leveraged to corrupt and destroy children all across the globe. Why any parent could do such evil to their own flesh and blood is a mystery to me.
|
|
|
hiturbine
|
Posts: | 72 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Likes: | 44 |
Points: |
|
|
|
Post by hiturbine on Jun 21, 2018 6:29:55 GMT
Would Mike Evancho refer to this Female Small Business owner as a " Small-Minded , Bigoted A**Hole? "
Nothing is black and white, is it. Strange distinction between serving him as a customer and creating floral art for him. One is just doing business and the other a violation of her faith? Objective reality is very much black and white. You are born only one of two sexes - not "gender" - but sex: male or female, either an XY or an XX chromosome in your DNA. That is proven scientific fact. Any other imagining is the result of emotional instability, mental illness, or coercion. Forcing an individual to violate their conscience is every bit as evil as committing murder. Being truthful is an act of charity to one's neighbor. Lying to yourself or others so to save face is not. In the first case she would sell him arrangements made by others, and not of her own hand. In the second case, she would be complicit by explicitly creating and thus taking an active role in doing that which her moral conscience informs to be wrong. The government is attempting to force her to be complicit in an act that her religious beliefs condemn as intrinsically contrary to the natural order. It is no different than me forcing you, through extortion, to murder, or to steal, or to lie or cheat It is not a subtle distinction between the first and the second case, although there are those who would like to conflate the two.
|
|
|
hiturbine
|
Posts: | 72 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Likes: | 44 |
Points: |
|
|
|
Post by hiturbine on Jun 21, 2018 6:34:36 GMT
Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Lets just say hypothetically that the Church of Satan , The American Nazi Party and the KKK all wanted Mike's Daughter Jackie Evancho to perform for them for upcoming Fundraising Events.
Being the open minded individual he claims to be he should have no problem escorting Jackie JJ, what brought this on? Why did you open this can of worms?
|
|
|
hiturbine
|
Posts: | 72 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Likes: | 44 |
Points: |
|
|
|
Post by hiturbine on Jun 21, 2018 15:12:42 GMT
Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission
Lets just say hypothetically that the Church of Satan , The American Nazi Party and the KKK all wanted Mike's Daughter Jackie Evancho to perform for them for upcoming Fundraising Events.
Being the open minded individual he claims to be he should have no problem escorting Jackie The problem with Mike E's "logic" is that he fails to recognize that his argument portrays an EMPLOYEE selling that which was MADE BY OTHERS to a customer - an action objectively distinct from demanding that the OWNER / EMPLOYER / INVENTOR / CREATOR / ARTIST / MUSICIAN, or whatever, DIRECTLY PARTICIPATE IN CONTRIBUTING THEIR OWN UNIQUE PRODUCT, specifically CREATED FOR the customer. One act constitutes a passive participation. The other is an active participation. There is a legal and moral distinction between the two. But leftists, liberals, and those who have abandoned objective truth in favor of a false or contrived empathy, either do not grasp, or otherwise refuse to admit, this distinction. The difference is that, in the case of an employee selling a product made by others, the employee serves only as a subjective agent for the employer, passively selling a product made by a third party. The objective creative act is totally removed from the employee. However, if an individual or entity specifically designs, invents, manufactures, composes, or otherwise works to create a unique product for a customer, then that action objectively constitutes DIRECT involvement. To put this argument in a more understandable context: If, as a employee of a gun shop, I legally sell you a firearm, which, although you are legally qualified to purchase, you use to commit murder - then neither I nor the manufacturer of the firearm are responsible for your action. OTOH, if I DIRECTLY PARTICIPATE to help you plan or commit the murder, then I am COMPLICIT in your act. That is the difference that Mike Evancho and those who have his mindset do not grasp. Another way to look at Mike's "viewpoint" is that one may become so "open-minded" as to make their intellect into a sieve, where nothing of objective reality is allowed to remain in place. This is what is meant by "darkening the intellect." Obective reality is rejected in favor of indulging in subjective fantasy. How else may one explain transgender theory, and the mindset of those individuals who willingly mutilate their body because they reject the obvious ontological truth of their sex so to bring about an imagined "gender identity?"
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Aug 17, 2018 1:21:56 GMT
|
|
|
cuivre
|
Posts: | 1 |
Joined: | January 1970 |
Likes: | 3 |
Points: |
|
|
|
Post by cuivre on Aug 30, 2018 3:00:40 GMT
I'm reconnecting with the Jackie group after being away a while. I am sincerely saddened to see Mike, of all people, adopt this destructive ad hominem attack on his FORMER faith. He and his family are no longer Catholics, as far as I'm concerned. His ideology is what is destroying the Catholic Church, especially given the liberalization of the Church and the leadership constantly forgiving and covering for the worst actors in the priesthood-molestors and pederasts. The current pope even had the audacity to ask "who am I to judge?". He is the pope! In this statement, he gives a de-facto admission that he does not even think his word, as the pope, is the infallible word of God for Catholics to look to. Ironically, and for this particular pope, I agree that he is far removed from being infallible WRT Catholic doctrines. The Catholic Church is dying, and he Evancho mentality is part of what is destroying it.
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Dec 21, 2018 1:45:28 GMT
For each day Joanna and Breanna followed their religious beliefs and disobeyed the law, they would each be penalized up to $2500 and six months in jail. Caldron Pool December 12, 2018
Two artists from Phoenix, Arizona are facing 6 months in jail and heavy fines for refusing to create custom artworks promoting same-sex weddings.
The Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that Joanna Duka and Breanna Koski, owners of Brush & Nib Studio, are required by Phoenix law to create artwork for same-sex wedding ceremonies because they “cannot discriminate against potential patrons based on sexual orientation.”
According to Life Site News, “Not only are the Christian women threatened with jail time and fines should they refuse to create artwork celebrating gay ‘marriage’ because of Phoenix law, they could also be prosecuted for publishing a statement on their website explaining that their religious convictions prohibit them from doing so.”
The Court of Appeals ruled that Duka and Koski’s case was “one of a blanket refusal of service to the LGBTQ community,” despite the fact that the women were willing to serve any customer regardless of “sexual orientation.”
As Christians, the women declined to produce custom messages endorsing events that violated their religious convictions, however the court ruled that their artistic services were not “entitled to First Amendment free speech protections.”
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Dec 21, 2018 1:52:02 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Jan 24, 2019 20:57:58 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Mar 6, 2019 3:36:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Jun 11, 2019 19:29:29 GMT
|
|
|
Post by jackiejunkies on Jun 12, 2019 22:23:49 GMT
|
|